Best Cursor Alternatives for Code Completion in 2026
Cursor's Tab autocomplete is widely praised for its multi-line, context-aware completions. But if you find the completions inconsistent, want to stay in your preferred editor, or need a tool that works offline, several alternatives deliver excellent AI-powered code completion without requiring Cursor's full editor.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Pricing | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | Free plan Individual $10/month, Business $19/user/month | 4.6 |
| Supermaven | Free plan Pro $10/month | 4.5 |
| Tabnine | Free plan Dev $12/month, Enterprise custom pricing | 4 |
| Codeium | Free plan Team $12/user/month, Enterprise custom | 4.3 |
| Amazon CodeWhisperer (Amazon Q Developer) | Free plan Pro $19/user/month | 3.9 |
Detailed Reviews
GitHub Copilot
GitHub's AI pair programmer that provides real-time code suggestions directly in your editor, powered by OpenAI models.
Pros
- +Best-in-class editor integration across VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, and more
- +Trained on vast GitHub repository data for broad language coverage
- +Free for students and open-source maintainers
Cons
- -Completions can be less context-aware than Cursor's whole-file approach
- -No built-in chat or agentic editing in the base completion experience
- -Privacy concerns for developers working on proprietary code
Pricing
Supermaven
An ultra-fast AI code completion tool built for speed, delivering suggestions with minimal latency using a custom-trained model.
Pros
- +Noticeably faster completions than most competitors
- +Large context window for better multi-file awareness
- +Lightweight extension that does not slow down your editor
Cons
- -Focused purely on completions, lacks chat or refactoring features
- -Newer tool with a smaller user community
- -Limited language support compared to broader tools
Pricing
Tabnine
An AI code assistant offering personalised completions that can run entirely on-premises for maximum code privacy.
Pros
- +On-premises deployment option for full code privacy
- +Learns from your codebase to personalise suggestions over time
- +Supports 30+ programming languages and all major IDEs
Cons
- -Completions generally less sophisticated than newer AI tools
- -Free tier significantly limited compared to paid plans
- -On-premises setup requires dedicated infrastructure
Pricing
Codeium
A free AI code completion tool that supports over 70 languages and integrates with 40+ editors including VS Code, JetBrains, and Vim.
Pros
- +Generous free tier with unlimited completions for individuals
- +Exceptionally broad editor and language support
- +Fast and reliable with minimal setup required
Cons
- -Completions occasionally less contextually aware than premium tools
- -Advanced features like codebase indexing require paid plans
- -Chat capabilities less developed than dedicated AI editors
Pricing
Amazon CodeWhisperer (Amazon Q Developer)
Amazon's AI coding companion that provides code suggestions with built-in security scanning, now part of Amazon Q Developer.
Pros
- +Built-in security vulnerability scanning on suggestions
- +Excellent for AWS service integrations and infrastructure code
- +Reference tracking tells you when suggestions match open-source code
Cons
- -Completions quality trails behind Copilot and Cursor for general coding
- -Strongest with AWS-related code, less impressive elsewhere
- -Rebranding to Amazon Q has caused some confusion
Pricing
Our Verdict
GitHub Copilot remains the gold standard for pure code completion thanks to its unmatched editor support and training data breadth. For speed-obsessed developers, Supermaven is a revelation. If budget is the primary concern, Codeium's unlimited free completions are hard to beat. Tabnine wins for enterprises needing on-premises deployment.